Skip to main content

How to remove personal information from Google Search

How to remove personal information from Google Search
Google recently announced a game-changing update to its "Results about you" tool, making it significantly easier for users to remove their personal information, such as phone numbers, addresses, and email addresses, from search results.

This move comes as privacy concerns continue to rise, with individuals increasingly seeking control over their online presence.

Previously, the "Results about you" feature was buried within Google's settings, making it difficult for many users to find and utilise.

Now, the search engine giant has streamlined the process in a tutorial video, allowing users to initiate removal requests directly from Google Search.

How to remove personal info from Google Search results?

In a recent post on social media, the tech shared a tutorial video, explaining how users can use the new feature.

In its tutorial, the tech giant revealed a few simple steps for users to remove their personal information from search results.

Simply search for "Results about you" on Google Search. Use the URL mentioned in the tutorial.

(1) Then, click 'Get started' and follow the prompts.
(2) Enter the relevant personal information and set notification preferences.
(3) Confirm the information and Google will proactively monitor for matches. Users will receive alerts when their information is found in search results.
(4) Review the results and make requests to remove them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Army chief assures business community of ‘complete support’ for economic uplift

Chief of Army Staff Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa on Wednesday assured the business community of the army’s “complete support” for the economic uplift of the country. He made this assurance during a meeting with businessmen who called on him at the General Headquarters today, according to a statement by the military’s media affairs wing. A delegation of the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FPCCI) and the army chief discussed the “evolving regional economic environment” as well as the FPCCI’s role in the development of commercial and industrial hubs in Pakistan, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said. During the meeting, Gen Bajwa appreciated the role of the business community in the economic uplift of the country and affirmed all-out support of the army in this regard. The delegation, meanwhile, acknowledged the Pakistan Army’s role and sacrifices in the provision of a "secure enabling environment" for economic prosperity in the country, acco...

3rd U-19 Women T20: South Africa beat Pakistan by 52 runs

In the third T20 of the five-match series in Karachi, South Africa Under-19 women's team defeated Pakistan Under-19 women's team by 52 runs tonight. Batting first, South Africa Under-19 women's team scored 158 runs for the loss of six wickets in allotted 20 overs. In reply, Pakistan Under-19 women's team were all out for 106 runs in 18 overs. South Africa lead the series 2-1.

Military court case: SC rejects govt plea for constitution of full court bench

The Supreme Court of Pakistan has rejected a government plea to constitute a full court bench to decide the issue of civilian trials in military courts. The government had urged the court to set up a full court on the question. The was heard by a six-member larger bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, which reserved its judgment on Tuesday. The bench ruled that judges were not available for the constitution of full court bench due to summer vacations. The bench includes Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi and Justice Ayesha Malik. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court remarked during the hearing yesterday (on Tuesday) that there should be an independent body to review whether the arrests were made on valid grounds or not. The attorney general of Pakistan submitted the details of 102 people who face military trials to the court. Justice Mazahir Naqvi said in his remarks why other accused in the same case ...